Location: D.O.O.M.D. Home website

Discussion: World DominationReported This is a featured thread

Showing 21 - 36 of 36  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2
Winderful
Winderful
20. RE: World Domination
Jun 25 2008, 9:55 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 25 2008, 9:55 PM EDT
Well, the antidote would be in my hands, so you guys don't have to worry about it. :P
Nooo, how about start spreading it to bad people first? (Even though we're supposed to be evil, it doesn't hurt to do some good....while taking over the world) The parasites would be attracted to evilness(not including us, we're immune), so they can latch themselves onto their hosts without us having to do all the work. And the parasite should be something common in life, probably a juicy looking berry that the host (unsuspectingly) ingests, allowing the parasite in. Now isn't that wonderful? :D
6  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Presto7794
Presto7794
21. RE: World Domination
Jul 2 2008, 10:35 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 2 2008, 10:35 AM EDT
"Well, the antidote would be in my hands, so you guys don't have to worry about it. :P
Nooo, how about start spreading it to bad people first? (Even though we're supposed to be evil, it doesn't hurt to do some good....while taking over the world) The parasites would be attracted to evilness(not including us, we're immune), so they can latch themselves onto their hosts without us having to do all the work. And the parasite should be something common in life, probably a juicy looking berry that the host (unsuspectingly) ingests, allowing the parasite in. Now isn't that wonderful? :D "
Hum... I get it eliminate the competition!
Yes but, we also need a 'strand' of the virus/parasite that controls smart people! That way they can't come up with an antidote.
I don't think it should be a berry. Perhaps a virus that spreads from person to person contact. Like maybe a zombie type thing, they move slower, get a little bit more strength. Intelligence would be suppressed, that way they can take orders but not have rebellious ideas. They should also have an uncontrolable hunger that will also 'keep them in check.'
5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
Winderful
Winderful
22. RE: World Domination
Jul 2 2008, 1:35 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 2 2008, 1:35 PM EDT
Hmm, a virus spreads too quickly, and it doesn't allow us to have some fun. And it's not fun if their intelligence is surpressed too... I mean, it's waaay too boring and easy that way. With people trying to escape, we'll get to toy with them, and their failures are more fun this way. Plus, if someone figures out the anitdote, so what? We'll get to exercise our tactics and have fun in the chase. :P 6  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Arabell
Arabell
23. RE: World Domination
Jul 3 2008, 6:44 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 3 2008, 6:44 PM EDT
"Hum... I get it eliminate the competition!
Yes but, we also need a 'strand' of the virus/parasite that controls smart people! That way they can't come up with an antidote.
I don't think it should be a berry. Perhaps a virus that spreads from person to person contact. Like maybe a zombie type thing, they move slower, get a little bit more strength. Intelligence would be suppressed, that way they can take orders but not have rebellious ideas. They should also have an uncontrolable hunger that will also 'keep them in check.'
"
But then it'll be like tag!
"ROAR! I touched you, now you're evil."
"YAY EVIL! Now I have to go touch someone else!"

That's.... scary. In a baaaad way.... ,_,
5  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Winderful
Winderful
24. RE: World Domination
Jul 3 2008, 9:45 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 3 2008, 9:45 PM EDT
"But then it'll be like tag!
"ROAR! I touched you, now you're evil."
"YAY EVIL! Now I have to go touch someone else!"

That's.... scary. In a baaaad way.... ,_,"
Haha! I love that perspective! Except everything would be too easy. :P
5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
Presto7794
Presto7794
25. RE: World Domination
Jul 3 2008, 9:54 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 3 2008, 9:54 PM EDT
"Haha! I love that perspective! Except everything would be too easy. :P"
Hum... I see your point.
I say we let people who have a certain charecteristic resesent to the virus, that way we can have some real fun!
But what charecteristic?
4  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Winderful
Winderful
26. RE: World Domination
Jul 3 2008, 10:13 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 3 2008, 10:13 PM EDT
Why can't we just let Mother Nature do her thing? Stop being controlling, at least for this. 3  out of 4 found this valuable. Do you?    
Presto7794
Presto7794
27. RE: World Domination
Jul 3 2008, 11:07 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 3 2008, 11:07 PM EDT
"Why can't we just let Mother Nature do her thing? Stop being controlling, at least for this."
It's part of MY nature. If we let mother nature take controll then everone will be all 'it wasn't doomd it was just a stuiped berry.'
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Winderful
Winderful
28. RE: World Domination
Jul 27 2008, 9:20 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 27 2008, 9:20 PM EDT
You're taking all the fun out of the chase.

:(
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Presto7794
Presto7794
29. RE: World Domination
Jul 27 2008, 10:02 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 27 2008, 10:02 PM EDT
"You're taking all the fun out of the chase.

:("
well if it were up to me, we would just scare the public into submission :)
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Winderful
Winderful
30. RE: World Domination
Jul 28 2008, 12:08 AM EDT | Post edited: Jul 28 2008, 12:08 AM EDT
Booooring...>_> 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Presto7794
Presto7794
31. RE: World Domination
Jul 28 2008, 7:35 PM EDT | Post edited: Jul 28 2008, 7:35 PM EDT
"Booooring...>_>"
well we could always do it legally

then some organization would find out and we would have some fun stopping them from throurting our plan
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Arabell
Arabell
32. RE: World Domination
Aug 3 2008, 2:21 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 3 2008, 2:21 PM EDT
"It's part of MY nature. If we let mother nature take controll then everone will be all 'it wasn't doomd it was just a stuiped berry.'"
Weeell, if Doomd made the berry, wouldn't it still be Doomd's doing? :\
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Presto7794
Presto7794
33. RE: World Domination
Aug 3 2008, 4:15 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 3 2008, 4:15 PM EDT
"Weeell, if Doomd made the berry, wouldn't it still be Doomd's doing? :\"
yes, but we would have to say it and that would be bosting
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Arabell
Arabell
34. RE: World Domination
Aug 7 2008, 2:02 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 7 2008, 2:02 PM EDT
"yes, but we would have to say it and that would be bosting"
True... but what if we pretend to be witches or something and people blame everything bad on us?
Then... hmm, that wouldn't be good.

Oh well! I'm outta ideas. :3
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Presto7794
Presto7794
35. RE: World Domination
Aug 7 2008, 3:02 PM EDT | Post edited: Aug 7 2008, 3:02 PM EDT
yeah but, its not the same

witches?!
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Previous | 1 2